Find IP. Find Location. Connect Time taken to setup the between connection Site24x7 and website. First Byte The time spent waiting for the web server to send data. Last Byte The time at which the entire content of the file is downloaded.
Handshake Time The time taken to complete the handshake. Check website availability. Unable to check. Please try again later! Domain Blacklist check Results:. IP Blacklist check Results:. Blacklists IP Address. Want to be sure you are not blacklisted? Sign Up for Site24x7. Country Code. Country Name. Server Header details :. Cleaning Code :. Checking for broken links :. Identifying links in your webpage :. Identifying webpage transfer rates :. This'll save you a lot of work otherwise wasted on posting to and checking to all these different groups a.
I thought it was not possible. Sorry about that. I provide my answer here: Hi, I guess I was not clear enough. I do not want to validate the output of a php page, I want to validate the php page itself.
That's a very important rule I follow. TIDY does this work. Unfortunatelly it doesn't like php tags and remove a lot of them. I would like to work on the templates and not on the output to do the job automatically. If I work on the output, I have to manually update all the templates!! Unfortunatelly I have a lot of templates.
Do you have an idea? Jerry Stuckle. How you generate the html and yes, you are using PHP to generate HTML - the link destination in the href is part of html is unimportant.
The result is html. No, this validates the output ok you could provide the php file as an input. And as I said I would like the tool to do the modification itself. Like the great TIDY tool but it removes php code!! How to say And believe me, this is not the same thing, even if, obviously, the output is exactly the same HTML. It does not mean that you can only validate a.
The proof with TIDY. It is able to work with php tags you even have some option to deal with php. Unfortunately, it does that badly. A lot of bugs. So I am wondering if there is another tool like TIDy but without bugs. I belong to the second family No, there is no difference. In either case you are using PHP to output information to the page. Nothing more, nothing less. You are getting lost in the details.
Look at the higher level. Rod So what exactly do you want to validate? The only important things are - the PHP code itself is valid the interpreter will tell you if it's not , and the HTML output is valid which the validator will tell you. What exactly do you expect? No, there is no difference. This is because you are focusing on the outpout.
So what exactly do you want to validate? This is what I want. I want it to udpate the code. I'm sure you understand that I need to do this step on the input the php page instead of the output or its work will be lost!!!!! And then you get a better understanding of the difference between familly 1 and familly 2. Obviously, if you want to validate the output, there is no difference who said it is what I want? And that's why it is always recommended to belong to the second family ;- Rod.
Toby A Inkster. It's easy enough to say, use the w3c validator and fix the HTML yourself! It would have to figure out how and where the HTML came from.
No tool can be that smart. I suppose it could be done if combined with some template based programming discipline, but it'd be easier to use the w3c validator to find the errors, and your knowledge of your script to figure out where that error came from.
Then who cares about how it's generated? I sure don't. You're fixating on the details instead of the overall picture. The only important things are - the PHP code itself is valid the interpreter will tell you if it's not , I don't care about the PHP code Then don't worry about validating the source.
Just use the HTML validator to check the output. And that's why it is always recommended to belong to the second family ;- Rod You've got it. It's called "Brain 1. And no program has replaced it yet. That's what you get paid for. No, again. Definetely not. Yes of course. TIDY team could fix their bugs or I could even do the tool myself but I do not have time to spend with that, unfortunatelly. Yes of course, but I am trying to figure how to avoid it. If there is no solution, I will do it myself of course.
I am just looking for this tool, it could help now and in the future. Tidy does this work, but unfortunatelly with some bugs. This is easy to do, just an algorithm. Everybody who writes a compilator one day know how it is easy grammar etc etc. It also supports string replacements through with groups.
It runs against a Java engine. This free Java regular expression tester lets you test your regular expressions against any entry of your choice and clearly highlights all matches. It is based on the Pattern class of Java 8. Generate a quartz cron expression with an easy to use online interface. Convert a cron expression into a readable text that clearly explains when it will execute, and visualize the next execution dates of your cron expression.
List of code validation tools. Features XPath 2.
0コメント